Paper Submission Guidelines
The submission of papers will be done electronically using the following link of Microsoft's Conference Management Toolkit (MS CMT): Link for Submission
Paper Submission Guidelines
All Accepted and presented papers will be published in ISTE’s IJTE Journal (UGC Care Listed Journal)
Selected good quality papers will be published in Scopus indexed Journal at extra cost.
The following guidelines must be carefully followed:
1) Manuscripts submitted to the conference will be initially go through Plagarism check (The similarity of text and AI Plagarism should not exceed 10%), All submissions will be screened for plagiarism by Turnitin.
2) Each submitted paper will undergo double blind review process after initial scrutiny, in the second stage articles are reviewed by the reviewers
3) All papers that conform to submission guidelines will be evaluated based on originality, technical and/or research content/depth, correctness, relevance to conference, contributions, and readability. Acceptance of papers will be communicated to authors by email. The authors of the accepted papers will be allowed to make corrections in accordance with the suggestions of the reviewers and submit final camera-ready papers within the stipulated deadline. All camera ready papers must be prepared in conformance with reviewer’s report.
4) Manuscripts should not exceed 7 pages, The cost of each extra page will be Rs. 175.00, which includes 18% GST.
5) Each article may have a maximum of four authors, each of whom must be identified by their affiliation and email address and indicate the corresponding author.
6) Word and PDF formats are required for all articles.
7) At the time of submission of CRC, Every manuscript must be submitted with a copyright form (CRF) signed by each author.
Please complete the registration and uploading of the above documents within stipulated time in order to ensure publication of the paper in prescribed Journal.
Preapare the manuscript in above prescribed MS Word format and
Word Templete:
Copywrite Form to be filled after the acceptance and at the time of submission of CRC :
Review Process
We are going to conduct a very rigorous review for the articles submitted for the Conference. How we are going to conduct the review process is following:
Step 1: Initial Assessment By Conference Chairs:
At this first stage, the Conference Chairs will decide if article are suitable for the conference, asking questions such as
Has the author followed the conference submission guidelines?
Is this the right conference for this article on the basis of Conference scope and tracks.
Will the Conference participates find it interesting?
Following plagiarism policy?
Note: The Conference Chairs might reject the article immediately based on the above mentioned points, but otherwise it will move to the next stage, and into Double blind peer review.
Step 2: First Round of Double Blind Peer Review:
The editor will find and contact 2 or 3 other researchers or academics (technical committee members or form outside of the same) who are experts in the same field. They will be asked to review your article, and advise the Conference Chairs with their valuable comments. So what are the reviewers are looking for? This depends on the subject area, but they will be checking that your work is:
Original or New, your study design and methodology are appropriate and described so that others could replicate what you’ve done, Are your results clearly and appropriately explained? Are your conclusions are reliable and significant.
The work is of a high enough standard to be published in the conference proceedings.
The authors will be given the feedback about their article, telling them if any changes need to be made before it can be published. Our authors tell us that the reviewers’ comments can be extremely helpful, ensuring that the article is of a high quality. Please note the final editorial decision on a paper and the choice of who to invite to review is always at the Conference Chairs’s discretion.
Step 3: Revise And Resubmit:
The authors can amend their article based on the reviewers’ comments and resubmitting it with changes made.
Step 4: Accepted:
And that’s it, authors made it through peer review. Next step is publication.
Peer Review Integrity:
Every article submitted for publication in ICMAAI has been through peer review; its quality, validity, and relevance assessed by independent peers within the relevant field. We believe in the integrity of peer review.
Paper Submission Guidelines
The submission of papers will be done electronically using the following link of Microsoft's Conference Management Toolkit (MS CMT): Link for Submission
Paper Submission Guidelines
All Accepted and presented papers will be published in ISTE’s IJTE Journal (UGC Care Listed Journal)
Selected good quality papers will be published in Scopus indexed Journal at extra cost.
The following guidelines must be carefully followed:
1) Manuscripts submitted to the conference will be initially go through Plagarism check (The similarity of text and AI Plagarism should not exceed 10%), All submissions will be screened for plagiarism by Turnitin.
2) Each submitted paper will undergo double blind review process after initial scrutiny, in the second stage articles are reviewed by the reviewers
3) All papers that conform to submission guidelines will be evaluated based on originality, technical and/or research content/depth, correctness, relevance to conference, contributions, and readability. Acceptance of papers will be communicated to authors by email. The authors of the accepted papers will be allowed to make corrections in accordance with the suggestions of the reviewers and submit final camera-ready papers within the stipulated deadline. All camera ready papers must be prepared in conformance with reviewer’s report.
4) Manuscripts should not exceed 7 pages, The cost of each extra page will be Rs. 175.00, which includes 18% GST.
5) Each article may have a maximum of four authors, each of whom must be identified by their affiliation and email address and indicate the corresponding author.
6) Word and PDF formats are required for all articles.
7) At the time of submission of CRC, Every manuscript must be submitted with a copyright form (CRF) signed by each author.
Please complete the registration and uploading of the above documents within stipulated time in order to ensure publication of the paper in prescribed Journal.
Preapare the manuscript in above prescribed MS Word format and
Word Templete:
Copywrite Form to be filled after the acceptance and at the time of submission of CRC :
Review Process
We are going to conduct a very rigorous review for the articles submitted for the Conference. How we are going to conduct the review process is following:
Step 1: Initial Assessment By Conference Chairs:
At this first stage, the Conference Chairs will decide if article are suitable for the conference, asking questions such as
Has the author followed the conference submission guidelines?
Is this the right conference for this article on the basis of Conference scope and tracks.
Will the Conference participates find it interesting?
Following plagiarism policy?
Note: The Conference Chairs might reject the article immediately based on the above mentioned points, but otherwise it will move to the next stage, and into Double blind peer review.
Step 2: First Round of Double Blind Peer Review:
The editor will find and contact 2 or 3 other researchers or academics (technical committee members or form outside of the same) who are experts in the same field. They will be asked to review your article, and advise the Conference Chairs with their valuable comments. So what are the reviewers are looking for? This depends on the subject area, but they will be checking that your work is:
Original or New, your study design and methodology are appropriate and described so that others could replicate what you’ve done, Are your results clearly and appropriately explained? Are your conclusions are reliable and significant.
The work is of a high enough standard to be published in the conference proceedings.
The authors will be given the feedback about their article, telling them if any changes need to be made before it can be published. Our authors tell us that the reviewers’ comments can be extremely helpful, ensuring that the article is of a high quality. Please note the final editorial decision on a paper and the choice of who to invite to review is always at the Conference Chairs’s discretion.
Step 3: Revise And Resubmit:
The authors can amend their article based on the reviewers’ comments and resubmitting it with changes made.
Step 4: Accepted:
And that’s it, authors made it through peer review. Next step is publication.
Peer Review Integrity:
Every article submitted for publication in ICMAAI has been through peer review; its quality, validity, and relevance assessed by independent peers within the relevant field. We believe in the integrity of peer review.